Daily Dingelberry 04-28-12 Way to Miss Da Point Y’all

Take off the blinders, man.

My partner here at Twocanview wrote the article Legitimized in Belizean Society by Aria Lightfoot https://twocanview.com/2012/04/26/legitimized-in-belizean-society-by-aria-lightfoot/ and nearly a 100 comments later on another page and a few others here and there on other pages, as well as here, there seems to be a deliberate misunderstanding of her point.

Aria was NOT and I will repeat it (because no matter how many times I said it or how many ways I said it, it was ignored), NOOOOOTTTT exploring HOW we came to have gangs. She was only pointing out that we Belizeans legitimize their activity in ways perhaps, we don’t even realize? Is that where the defensive opposition is coming from? A lack of realization of how many little ways we really do legitimize the drug dealers/gangs in our society?

Look. Legitimising doesn’t mean legalizing. It doesn’t necessarily mean that you are singing their praises to your children…some of the responses we got just made me feel like I had entered the Twilight Zone. So let’s explore what “legitimising” means.

-When you look the other way as one of your friends or family smokes a joint

– When you occasionally indulge in smoking a joint, snorting a line

-When you don’t show up to court as a witness in a case prosecuting one of these gang bangers

-When you think it is ok that the son of Mr. Soh and Soh “get off” for murder bc his family is soooo respected

-When you don’t call the cops when you just watched a crime being committed

-When you hear a domestic fight between a thug and his girl and you don’t call the cops because “da nuh nun a yer bizniz”.

-When you see a kid reach into his backpack and suspiciously palm something as he hands it off to your son.

-When you ask Mr. Soh and Soh for a donation for your youth program when you know where the money comes from.

-When you call the latest squeeze of Mr. Soh and Soh “Mrs.” and invite her to your fundraiser cause she will buy the $100 tickets

-When you admire their new car, their new house…their clothes

-When you let them buy you a drink or you go to their child’s birthday party, take you to the cayes, Can Cun

-When because his name is “brother” “son” “husband” you tell yourself “he isn’t all that bad”

-When you tell yourself “mek dey kill out deyself” thus making murder ok as long as it  is one of “them”.

I could go on and on but the point I am making is simply this: When you apply a different set of rules and standards for people because you secretly envy their material success or because you are afraid of retaliation or you simply want your cut, you legitimise gangbanging. It is not only the “gangbanging” itself. It is an entire set of behaviours, from misdemeanors to felonies.

You legitimise by NOT accepting that the gangbanger is not just the thug sagging his pants BUT it is Minister Soh and Soh. It is Mrs. Soh and Soh. The lone attitude that it is a minority in the depths of our city legitimises all the other ones living in Buttonwood Bay, San Pedro, Belmopan? By perpetuating the myth that it is the teenager riding barefooted on the bike, you are legitimizing the crooked lawyer you have dinner with or the business person you know is smuggling or money laundering.

People. The thug on the street is the symptom, the mere tip of the iceberg. If we want  to solve this so called “inner city” problem, you have to look at your mansions hidden in the hills along the Hummingbird Highway. You need to search the yachts docked in front of Placencia and San Pedro. You need to search the containers being shipped to churches. You need to turn in your friend the pilot who just flew a plane full of cocaine.

You need to get real. You need to get over your prejudices. You need to open your eyes and see what is right in front of you.

6 thoughts on “Daily Dingelberry 04-28-12 Way to Miss Da Point Y’all

  1. I get what you’re saying. But on another note…has it ever occurred to either of you that maybe some people disagreeing with you may be right and you may be wrong? Or that maybe the point we all supposedly missed wasn’t expressed properly. Or maybe that the author herself missed the point and rambled off course? I’m not picking a fight (God forbid, as I am petrified of one of the persons in twocanview) but I just think that if you both are writing a blog and inviting comments…then differing opinions must be respected and appreciated and even solicited. Discussion is healthy. Believing that your opinion is the only one and it needs to be shoved down our throats and anyone who doesn’t agree is stupid, or agenda-driven or, and I’ve heard this one several times, MISSING THE POINT is not healthy.

    I’m not only referring to this piece but others posted before.

    We’re not stupid…or so dense that the POINT needs to be broken down into one syllable words and explained to us. Sometimes we just want to correct, or add on, or disagree with. Isn’t that what this blog is all about?

    • Pick an opinion and stick with it Mike Rudon. One spell it is an excellent piece and in the same breath you disagree. I think you like to rambling. Clear your thoughts cause I am confused trying to keep up with so many contradicting opinions!

    • Anonymous…might I suggest Ingles sin Fronteras (or English for Dummies if you prefer). It might help with the confusion you claim which is almost certainly caused by your inability to keep up. It would also assist with your grammar.

      Sorry…couldn’t resist.

    • I absolutely respect that no one is “stupid” Mike. But there is a place to bring up other issues. I am merely pointing out that we were comparing apples and oranges…and we never said that there aren’t other correct opinions, observations. On this particular point however, I am not budging. And just because I stick to this one like cement, doesn’t mean that I think anything anyone else said was wrong in and of itself…I just didn’t think that some of the info posited was enhancing this particular exploration… Did you read comment for comment? When you do, you will perhaps see what I am talking about.

    • Now about the blog itself, we do have a certain purpose in mind. One of the most important agendas we have is to NOT turn a blind eye to the nasty poisonous dynamics playing out in our society. Take a step back. I believe you may come to see that the initial opposition you feel towards some of what we say comes from a place of hurt. We Belizeans are very proud of our country, our people, our identity. Even if we know something is true, we have a hard time accepting it. But I promise, part of our agenda is NOT to place blame. This is why I cut through some of the comments people make because it is filled with trying to place blame on “others”, “them”…but I strongly believe there is no “we/they”. There is only “we/us”. Another thing one needs to keep in mind when reading what we write, we are doing this as OUR contribution to CHANGE. We are not on the ground. We are not the foot soldiers BUT we can bring awareness, ask the hard questions and hopefully serve as a motivating force for others to forge new directions. Keep commenting Mike and thank you for having the courage to challenge us. It is only through continued examination that we can hope to grow and develop.

  2. ….or as the newly elected president of guatamala proposes, we can legitimize drugs and collect legitimate tax revenue from them

Comments are closed.